This website uses cookies to help us give you the best experience when you visit our website. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies.
Pinchevski, N. A. A., & Pinchevski, A. . (2020). Archiving the Name of God. In M. Höfner & Friedrich, B. (Eds.), Gottes Gegenwarten – God’s Presences (pp. 421-431). EVANGELISCHE VERLAGSANSTALT Leipzig.Abstract
This chapter considers two cases of contemporary genizah in terms of analog and digital media as they comply and conflict with traditional decrees. The first is a debate surrounding the discarding of audiocassettes containing sermons that if were to be written textually rather than sound recorded would have to be treated as genizah worthy. The second is the feasibility of an obligatory digital genizah, containing both digital artifacts and documents. Ultimately, both cases were not deemed as genizah worthy due to their non-textual and non-inscriptional logic.
In Transmitted Wounds, Amit Pinchevski explores the ways media technology and logic shape the social life of trauma both clinically and culturally. Bringing media theory to bear on trauma theory, Pinchevski reveals the technical operations that inform the conception and experience of traumatic impact and memory. He offers a bold thesis about the deep association of media and trauma: media bear witness to the human failure to bear witness, making the traumatic technologically transmissible and reproducible.
Taking up a number of case studies--the radio broadcasts of the Eichmann trial; the videotaping of Holocaust testimonies; recent psychiatric debates about trauma through media following the 9/11 attacks; current controversy surrounding drone operators' post-trauma; and digital platforms of algorithmic-holographic witnessing and virtual reality exposure therapy for PTSD--Pinchevski demonstrates how the technological mediation of trauma feeds into the traumatic condition itself. The result is a novel understanding of media as constituting the material conditions for trauma to appear as something that cannot be fully approached and yet somehow must be.
While drawing on contemporary materialist media theory, especially the work of Friedrich Kittler and his followers, Pinchevski goes beyond the anti-humanistic tendency characterizing the materialist approach, discovering media as bearing out the human vulnerability epitomized in trauma, and finding therein a basis for moral concern in the face of violence and atrocity. TransmittedWounds unfolds the ethical and political stakes involved in the technological transmission of mental wounds across clinical, literary, and cultural contexts.
“This book delves into the combustible mixture of mind and media. Amit Pinchevski follows the hint in recent media theory that media are not just cultural artifacts to be interpreted but fundamental infrastructures that constitute and provide access to whatever it is we think of as mind. His media formulation of trauma as the mediation of failed mediation may well become, once its full resonances are absorbed, field-defining. The book is a fascinating study for thoroughly tying together media and trauma, but it achieves much more by asking key moral questions about the meaning of immediacy, presence, and telepresence in the face of some of the major catastrophes of our time.” —John Durham Peters, María Rosa Menocal Professor of English and of Film & Media Studies, Yale University
“This thought-provoking book gives us new ways to understand the mediation of trauma and collective memory and the relationship between technology and human suffering. Eloquent and wise, Pinchevski’s book raises urgent moral and political questions we all need to keep asking.” —Katie Trumpener, Emily Sanford Professor of Comparative Literature and English, Yale University
“A highly original intervention into trauma theory. Pinchevksi’s deft and erudite analyses shine a light on how the digital is shaping memories of traumatic pasts in new ways. Tackling an exciting range of material from videography and testimony to the uses of virtual reality for therapy, this is an outstanding research book which every student of memory should read.” —Anna Reading, Professor of Culture and Creative Industries, King’s College, University of London, and Western Sydney University, Australia, and author of Gender and Memory in the Globital Age (2016)
Media Events is a key text in explicating the relation between media and event insofar as it provides an account of time experienced through the structures and practices of broadcasting. We suggest that Dayan and Katz's book investigates the heyday of a particular version of historicity, which is now giving way to a networked configuration of media events. Media witnessing introduces a bottom-up rather than top-down making of the event. The expansion of mobile digital technologies gives rise to multiple temporalities and trajectories of events through the media.
This article takes sound as its analytical point of departure in asking the following question: What does sound do in television news? Exploring the conventions of sound used by producers of Israeli television news, from the signature tune to the various news items, this study reveals the role of sound as part of journalistic framing practices but also as an insidious element challenging the visual as well as the construction of framing. We suggest that inquiring into the acoustic features of television news may offer new insights into the news genre and its practices. We propose the term soundscape as a complementary conceptual metaphor to framing with the aim of counteracting the visual bias dominating the academic discourse of political communication and journalism studies.
This article applies a media geneaology perspective to examine the operative logic of Google Translate. Tracing machine translation from post–World War II (WWII) rule-based methods to contemporary algorithmic statistical methods, we analyze the underlying power structure of algorithmic and human collaboration that Translate encompasses. Focusing on the relationship between technology, language, and speakers, we argue that the operative logic of Translate represents a new model of translation, which we call uniform multilingualism. In this model, the manifest lingual plurality on the user side is mediated by lingual uniformity on the system side in the form of an English language algorithm, which has recently given way to an artificial neural network interlingual algorithm. We conclude by considering the significance of this recent shift in Translate’s algorithm.
Pinchevski, A. . (2016). Alterity. In International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. London: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from Publisher's VersionAbstract
Although entering only recently into communication scholarship, the problem of alterity is intrinsic to communication theory and philosophy. Alterity presents the challenge of resistance to communication and of the limit of communication. As such, it invites rethinking communication not simply as a question of knowledge and understanding but as a question of ethics and politics.
This article explores the elective affinities between autism and new media. Autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) provides a uniquely apt case for considering the conceptual link between mental disability and media technology. Tracing the history of the disorder through its various media connections and connotations, we propose a narrative of the transition from impaired sociability in person to fluent social media by network. New media introduce new affordances for people with ASD: The Internet provides habitat free of the burdens of face-to-face encounters, hightech industry fares well with the purported special abilities of those with Asperger’s syndrome, and digital technology offers a rich metaphorical depository for the condition as a whole. Running throughout is a gender bias that brings communication and technology into the fray of biology versus culture. Autism invites us to rethink our assumptions about communication in the digital age, accounting for both the pains and possibilities it entails.
The face is our most basic medium of sociality. Like every medium, it is what stands in the middle, both connects and separates—connects by virtue of separating—producing commonality while maintaining its in-betweenness. It is possible to identify three functions of the face as a medium: it is the surface by which we appear, the interface through which we interact, and the face-to-face in which we care for others. Regarding the face as a medium is meant here as a heuristic tool, with the aim of offering some reflections on the way technical media configure the social life of the face.
Recent studies in psychiatry reveal an acceptance of trauma through the media. Traditionally restricted to immediate experience, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is now expanding to include mediated experience. How did this development come about? How does mediated trauma manifest itself? What are its consequences? This essay addresses these questions through three cases: (1) ‘trauma film paradigm’, an early 1960s research program that employed films to simulate traumatic effects; (2) the psychiatric study into the clinical effects of watching catastrophic events on television, culminating with the September 11 attacks; (3) reports on drone operators who exhibit PTSD symptoms after flying combat missions away from the war zone. The recognition of mediated trauma marks a qualitative change in the understanding of media effects, rendering the impact literal and the consequences clinical. What informs recent speculations about the possibility of trauma through media is a conceptual link between visual media and contemporary conceptions of trauma.
This article explores the way Levinas communicates his ethical message through the media at work in his work speech, writing, and rare references to modern media. Levinas’s ethical message concerns the import of the relation with the other, a relation that interrupts any attempt at its thematization, including Levinas’s own philosophy. Levinas’s text serves as an exemplary medium for this ethical message in conveying the teaching of ethics along with the interruption it advocates. The article then extends the logic of the ethical message beyond the two key media present in Levinas’s work—speech and writing—to speculate on whether the interruption it effects can be carried over to audiovisual media. Running throughout is the question of mediation, which takes the discussion outside the context of the face to face, where Levinas’s thought is typically situated, to the context of the third and of justice. Levinas’s thought may thus lead toward a radical ethics of media—radical in the sense that it posits the act of mediation itself as the root of such ethics.
‘Media witnessing’ designates a new configuration of mediation, representation and experience that is involved in the transformation of our sense of historical significance. It refers to the witnessing performed in, by and through the media: the appearance of witnesses in media reports, the possibility of media themselves bearing witness and the positioning of media audiences as witnesses to depicted events. Media witnessing is defined by three overlapping domains of practice: (1) the ways in which ubiquitous audiovisual media make the potential significance of incidentally recorded events available for immediate public reproduction; (2) the organization of interpersonal and mass media as hybrid assemblages of human and technological agents with shifting boundaries that defy traditional models of mass communication, producing ad-hoc communities of attention on a global scale; (3) the incorporation of audiences into a system of perpetual vigilance and the creation of cosmopolitan risk publics who perceive their commonality through representations of shared vulnerability. Media witnessing thus marks the age of the post-media event: it casts the audience as the ultimate addressee and primary producer, making the collective both the subject and the object of everyday witnessing.
Ethics of Media reopens the question of media ethics. Taking an exploratory rather than prescriptive approach, an esteemed collection of contributors tackle the diverse areas of moral questioning at work within various broadcasting practices, accommodating the plurality and complexity of present-day ethical challenges posed by the world of media.
Couldry, N., Madianou, M., & Pinchevski, A. . (2013). Ethics of Media: An Introduction. In N. Couldry, Madianou, M., & Pinchevski, A. (Eds.), Ethics of Media (pp. 1-18). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from Publisher's Version
Our photographic culture and the proliferation of images everywhere seem to create a sense of passivity or frustration in the face of the represented. Can we learn to look otherwise, or can we describe images that function like a face – that look back at us? And how can we describe the ways in which an image addresses us as if it werea face? These questions are informed by the philosophy of EmmanuelLévinas, and their trajectory lead to engagements with corresponding questions raised by Roland Barthes, Judith Butler and Giorgio Agamben.
Pinchevski, A. . (2011). Archive, Media, Trauma. In M. Neiger, Meyers, O., & Zandberg, E. (Eds.), On Media Memory: Collective Memory in a New Media Age (pp. 253-264). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from Publisher's Version
Department of Communication and Journalism The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mount Scopus 91905 Jerusalem, Israel Tel: +972-2-5883212 Fax:+972-2-5827069